<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00859nam a2200109Ia 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Linarelli, John</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Role of dispute settlement in world trade law : some lessons from the Kodak-Fuji dispute</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sets forth the main findings of the Kodak-Fuji panel report.  Examines the decision in the context of remedial activity that the United States attempted pursuant to its municipal law - the well-known section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988.  Provides an analytical framework for thinking about Kodak-Fuji, specifically, and about non-violation claims under Article XXIII : 1 (b), generally reaches the opposite conclusion of those reached by other scholars, who argue that Article XXIII should be interpreted narrowly.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="583" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">3/23/01</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">JOY_D</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">A</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">23435</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">23435</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CRCM</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CRCM</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2023-05-04</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">0000000017449</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-05-04 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2023-05-04</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">A</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
