<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Role of dispute settlement in world trade law : some lessons from the Kodak-Fuji dispute</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Linarelli, John</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <dateIssued>2000</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <abstract>Sets forth the main findings of the Kodak-Fuji panel report.  Examines the decision in the context of remedial activity that the United States attempted pursuant to its municipal law - the well-known section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988.  Provides an analytical framework for thinking about Kodak-Fuji, specifically, and about non-violation claims under Article XXIII : 1 (b), generally reaches the opposite conclusion of those reached by other scholars, who argue that Article XXIII should be interpreted narrowly.</abstract>
  <note>3/23/01 JOY_D</note>
  <recordInfo/>
</mods>
