<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00665nam a2200133Ia 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="080" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">09.05.07 D285</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">de Araujo, Jos&#xE9; Tavares</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Antidumping in the Americas</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">CEPAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">SantiagoCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2001</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">33 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Seeks to place the debate on antidumping in a wide-ranging context, so as to suggest possible approaches for the treatment of antidumping in the negotiations to create an FTAA.  Argues that the proper focus of discussions on antidumping should be a broad framework that takes into account the costs and benefits of all import relief measures, including safeguards.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="583" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">7/9/01</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">M2L</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">M</subfield>
    <subfield code="m">D285</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">23628</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">23628</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CRCM</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CRCM</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2023-05-04</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">09.05.07 D285</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">0000000017642</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-05-04 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2023-05-04</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">M</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
