<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00814nam a2200133Ia 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="080" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">09.05.02 G984</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Guti&#xE9;rrez, Gabriel</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ex-post evaluation of the employment effects of a preferential trade agreement : methodological issues, illustrated with a reference to Chile</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">CEPAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">SantiagoCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2005</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">65 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Discusses the major methodological issues relating to some key studies assessing the employment effects of a particular preferential trade agreement (PTA) using different methodologies.  Focuses on an accounting model for decomposing the ex-post employment performance as related to Latin America Preferential Trade Agreements proposing this method to evaluate the Chile-Mexico PTA  as an illustration.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="583" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">3/22/06</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">JOYD</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">M</subfield>
    <subfield code="m">G984</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">28546</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">28546</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CRCM</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CRCM</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2023-05-08</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">09.05.02 G984</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">0000000022560</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-05-08 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2023-05-08</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">M</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
