<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01116nam a2200133Ia 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="080" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">11.01.01 W9132</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Woolcock, Stephen</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Public procurement and the Economic Partnership Agreements : assessing the potential impact on ACP procurement policies</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">Commonwealth Secretariat</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">[London]GB</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2008</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">51 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Describes the nature of rules on government procurement and discusses the distinction between transparency and liberalization.  Considers trends in rules on government procurement in other free trade agreements and at the plurilateral level in the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) of the WTO.  Looks at the likely costs to and benefits for the ACP states of adopting rules similar to those adopted in the CARIFORUM-EC EPA text (EPA text).  Provides two case studies - South Africa and Uganda to illustrate the impact of any possible rules on the ACP procurement policies.  Suggests a number of ways in which the EPA text might be revised to more readily meet the needs and interests of the ACP states.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="583" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">5/30/08</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">JOYD</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">M</subfield>
    <subfield code="m">W9132</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">32876</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">32876</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CRCM</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CRCM</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2023-05-08</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">11.01.01 W9132</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">0000000026890</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-05-08 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2023-05-08</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">M</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
