<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>The Ethics of feedback of HIV test results in population-based surveys of HIV infection</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Maher, Dermot</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <dateIssued>2013</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <abstract>Argues that the justification for HIV surveys without routine feedback of results to participants based on a public health utility argument that the benefits of more rigorous survey methods, i.e. reduced participation bias - outweigh the benefits to individuals of knowing their HIV status.</abstract>
  <note>1/20/14 SANDRAW</note>
  <classification authority="udc">Serial</classification>
  <recordInfo/>
</mods>
