<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01045nam a2200145Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260716043011.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="080" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">08.06.04 S9475</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sugar in the EEC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">European News Agency</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BrusselsBE</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">1987</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1 v. (various pagings</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">IDS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Compares increasing global sugar production to stagnant consumption.  Suggests reasons for world market imbalances and notes the absence of an international agreement since 1984.  Reviews prospects for the world sugar market.  Examines EEC sugar regulations noting the controversy surrounding the common market organization and pointing out the need for new regulations. Discusses new problems caused by Spain and Portugal's entry into the EEC.  Describes competition faced by sugar used in food from artificial sweeteners of industrial and plant origin and notes their impact on the European market.  Discusses non-edible uses of sugar, the future of bio-ethanol and diversification efforts of sugar companies.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="583" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">3/7/00</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">M2LMGR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">M</subfield>
    <subfield code="m">S9475</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">38479</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">38479</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
