<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00978nam a2200145Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260716043013.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="080" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">01.02.05 L9175</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lowenthal, Abraham F.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Partners in conflict : the United States and Latin America</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">Johns Hopkins University P.</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BaltimoreUS</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">1987</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xi, 240 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Argues that present U.S. policy toward Latin America is outdated and out of focus because of the failure of the U.S. to appreciate L.A.'s economic, social and political transformation over the past 25 years.  Shows that the primary importance of Latin America to the U.S. lies not in national security but in the region's impact on the U.S. economy.  Within this framework demonstrates that U.S. interests are most significant in Mexico, Brazil and the Caribbean.  Proposes a new approach towards Latin America and the Caribbean based on policies directed to build cooperative relations.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="583" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">3/7/00</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">M2LMGR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">M</subfield>
    <subfield code="m">L9175</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">38546</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">38546</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
