<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00716nam a2200145Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260716044058.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="080" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">01.02.06 R454</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Revill, James</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Peer-review mechanism for the biological and toxin weapons convention</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">United Nations</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">New YorkUS</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xviii, 96 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sets out a number of prerequisities for any peer-review system. Concludes by identifying a number of advantages and disadvantages of a peer-review process. Recommends that one useful preliminary step that states parties could undertake would be communication between counterparts in agencies with experience of peer-review mechanisms.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="583" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">1/28/14</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">SANDRAW</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">M</subfield>
    <subfield code="m">R454</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">60022</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">60022</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
