<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Peer-review mechanism for the biological and toxin weapons convention</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Revill, James</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">New YorkUS</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>United Nations</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2013</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>xviii, 96 p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Sets out a number of prerequisities for any peer-review system. Concludes by identifying a number of advantages and disadvantages of a peer-review process. Recommends that one useful preliminary step that states parties could undertake would be communication between counterparts in agencies with experience of peer-review mechanisms.</abstract>
  <note>1/28/14 SANDRAW</note>
  <classification authority="udc">01.02.06 R454</classification>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260716044058.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
