| 000 | 00716nam a2200145Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20260716044058.0 | ||
| 080 | _a01.02.06 R454 | ||
| 100 | _aRevill, James | ||
| 245 | _aPeer-review mechanism for the biological and toxin weapons convention | ||
| 260 |
_bUnited Nations _aNew YorkUS _c2013 |
||
| 300 | _axviii, 96 p. | ||
| 520 | _aSets out a number of prerequisities for any peer-review system. Concludes by identifying a number of advantages and disadvantages of a peer-review process. Recommends that one useful preliminary step that states parties could undertake would be communication between counterparts in agencies with experience of peer-review mechanisms. | ||
| 583 |
_c1/28/14 _kSANDRAW |
||
| 942 |
_cM _mR454 |
||
| 999 |
_c60022 _d60022 |
||